Thursday, October 18, 2007

Future Topics

If ever someone devises a means by which one can package and sell time, he will be rich. As it stands, time is a commodity in short supply in my life. However, I have a number of topics on which I intend to post:
  • The lessons of 9/11
  • A paradigm for considering terrorism as it occurs today
  • Effective counter-terrorism
  • Waging war against an NGO
The astute out there will have already noticed a theme. September 11, 2001 was a pivotal day in history. Lee Harris refers to it as a world-historical event in his book Civilization and Its Enemies. Much has been said about that day and its effects, but what have we learned? And what do we need to remember? Perhaps most importantly, what do we do now?
In the past six years I've thought a great deal about these things, so I hope that my conclusions are helpful. Some of these topics will require more research, so there could be a significant delay before anything appears about them; and with an election coming up there is a good chance current events will intrude on my musings on the past and future.
I am, of course, open to suggestions for other topics. Feel free to comment thusly. I won't promise to post on anything else, but if a topic ignites an interest I may be unable to stop myself. You have been warned.

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Punctuation catastrophe

I had to change my blog title. The apostrophe was screwing up the subject line for my post notification emails. Actually, that wouldn't have been so bad, but after said apostrophe gets replaced with an ampersand field code (ask an HTML monkey, he/she'll explain it) I can't filter on the indicator in gmail. Apparently searching on "&" is a no go and it was quicker to change my Blog title than figure out how to search for "&".

Monday, October 8, 2007

One Ring to Rule Them All...

With apologies to Christopher Tolkien (and many heart-felt thanks to his father, J. R. R. Tolkien), I followed my train of thought from my email to Hannity a little further. The Lord of the Rings was not written as an allegory; Tolkien did not force a single interpretation on his readers. But its story can be seen as a metaphor for many situations. I believe we are living through one such situation.

Half a century ago, certain politicians forged the Federal Government into the One Ring. Continuing to this day, our elected officials continue to concentrate more and more power in this Ring and its strength is now vast. And now there are great contests to obtain and wield this power.
Those on the political Left have long taken a great interest in this Ring; it was they who first forged it among the ashes of the Great Depression (I'm well aware that this is a simplification, however many of the powers that the Federal Government now wields were consolidated and expanded under the Roosevelt administration with the New Deal). Later more power was added to the Ring with the "Great Society" so that Johnson could wage an endless "War on Poverty."
Sauron and his minions on the Left continue to demand more and more of our productivity through taxes to enthrall larger and larger segments of the population under the Ring's sway. They promise hand outs, not unlike the Seven rings given to the Dwarves and the Nine rings given to Men. Of course the result is the same: a part of the One Ring's power to wield over their fellow man in exchange for lifelong (and longer) servitude.
Eventually, those on the political Right caught on and began to resist. Ronald Regan came to power amidst great hope of liberty but even under his administration entitlement spending grew, and with it the power of the Ring. In the 1990's, when it seemed all hope was lost (as government controlled health care loomed) the Contract With America was forged and hope shone anew.
But hope soon faded. Rather than destroy the Ring, the Republican Congress slowly fell under its spell. They dressed it up with phrases like "Compassionate Conservatism," but it meant more spending and less liberty. Some (derisively referred to as RINOs) took the path of Saruman and are often indistinguishable from Sauron's other minions.

And so we stand today, in 2007. 2008 will see the election of a new president, new Representatives and Senators. The Ring is more powerful today than ever before, and it sits as a prize.

The Ring has not fallen, by happy chance, to a humble Hobbit. It is there for the taking. But this Ring, as with Tolkien's, should not be used. It should be destroyed.

We have Dr. James Dobson taking the role of Denethor, advising us to take hold of the Ring and wield it as a weapon for our devices. There are many who, as Boromir, would heed that advice. They would use the Ring to smite Sauron and his minions and as the master of the Ring bring goodness and wholesomeness to our nation.
Have they not seen what this Ring does to those who wield it? It is not a weapon that brings Liberty, but serfdom. By using the Ring, they would add yet more power to the Federal Government. Certainly it would be the power to do what THEY want, but what happens when they no longer control the Ring?

Many roles in this metaphor are not yet revealed. Who has the wisdom to guard us on the journey? Who will cut wasteful spending, and stand to oppose further entitlement expansion? Who will secure the borders of our nation? Who is Gandalf?
Who has the strength, wisdom, and authority to lead us and to take the throne? Who can challenge Sauron, in secret to wrench the Palantir from his control and openly in battle? Who is Aragorn?
Most importantly, who will take the Ring to Mordor? Who will dismantle the entitlement programs that have grown like ivy? Who is Frodo?

In the end, the Ring must be destroyed. The Federal Government has grown far too large. The programs that promised to lift the poor from their poverty have failed, and now they steal our productivity and our prosperity.

Those, like Dr. Dobson, who would throw their influence behind a third-party candidate who would wield the Ring for their purposes would divide what remaining strength the Right has. In the end, they will yield the Ring to Sauron.
This country cannot afford four years of any of the Democratic candidates, much less eight years. At this moment in history we need a leader who is committed to the destruction of the Ring, not one who promises to wield it for good.
Third-party candidates have a critical role to play in this: they must guard the path. Congressional Republicans are deserving of shame for their role in out-of-control spending and entitlement expansion. They rob us of our Liberty and our prosperity. They have betrayed us to the Ring, and usurped our Power.

The American People want to live in peace. We do not want our paychecks, estates, and inheritance plundered by the Federal Government. We want our Liberty back.

Much like the Council of Elrond, the Republican Party has long been a coalition party. There are many competing interests, but many long thought there was a common bond to reduce the size of the Federal Government. When we chose our Aragorn, we must preserve that coalition. But those in Congress who have betrayed our common bond must be dealt with. Those Representatives and Senators who will stand for fiscal restraint, limited government, and defending our nation must be supported. Those who stand in the way of these principles must be thrust aside.

This means no more earmarked spending. No more entitlements. And no more Federal control over State and local matters. Who can answer this call?

"I will take the Ring to Mordor... though I do not know the way."

Inspiration

It has been years since I've posted anything on the Internet, but today I was inspired.
My inspiration came while listening to the Sean Hannity show. A fellow Cincinnatian (named Sarah) called in to support Dr. James Dobson's advocacy of a third-party presidential candidate should either Rudy Guilliani, Fred Thompson, or John McCain get the Republican nomination. As a HUGE believer in Federalism and a supporter of Fred Thompson I... disagree. This inspired me to send the following email to Sean's show.

Sean,
For the past few years I've become very concerned about the state of conservatism in this country. It seems that, more and more, those who label themselves "conservative" have taken to nationalizing issues over which the federal government has no legitimate authority. Many among us have forgotten about the Separation of Powers, not among the three branches of government but between the States, the People and the Federal government. Where has the principle of Federalism gone?
The candidate I have heard most clearly state and most visibly demonstrate his commitment to Federalism is Senator Fred Thompson. While I disagree with some of the positions he has taken (specifically campaign finance reform and tort reform) I have no doubt of his commitment to stripping the power that the Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court has absconded from the States over the decades.
I have had great respect for Dr. James Dobson for many years. His writing was of great help to me through adolescence and into college. But his present demand to "win" on issues such as abortion and homosexual marriage at the national level further cements our path towards centralized power. I find it no exaggeration to say that this will end only in tyranny.
In taking this stand Dr. Dobson is fighting the good fight in the worst way. Those who would call themselves "conservative" would aid their cause best by fighting to restore these issues to the States. The more we, as conservatives, fight to "win" nationally the easier it is to accept Federal control in other areas, like health care. And the more liberty we lose to the Congress and the Federal beauracracy.
Christians especially should take care not to create a Leviathan to "defeat" their enemies nationally. Do we truly believe that we can maintain control of such a beast? We cannot, and we will not. Once created, how long will it be until the Leviathan is turned on us in the name of "diversity" or "tolerance"? We've fought these things on a small scale and out of fear we try to control the beast for our favor. We must slay the beast, and to do that we need leaders who have demonstrated that they will fight against the beast.
Dr. Dobson and those of like mind want to control the beast for the good of this nation. As you have stated on air, the polls show that by supporting a third-party control of the beast will pass to the Democratic Party.
The American people are weary of this beast of a Federal government we have. While Dr. Dobson searches for a candidate to weild the beast as a great weapon, I have found in Senator Thompson a candidate who can slay the beast. I can only hope and pray that Dr. Dobson sees the folly in his pursuit of a fabled hero to tame the beast and joins the fight to slay it.

I do hope that you will share these thoughts on air, as I think the American people (particularly your listeners) need to hear them. For too long the right has fought for control when it should have fought to dismantle. It is time to tear down the huge Federal ediface we have constructed and return the Power to the People (to borrow Laura Ingrahm's line).

Mitch Oliver